Tag Archives: cryptocurrency

Cryptocurrency: Fundraising Evolved

(BitcoinMagazine) If you read my previous articles about energy companies in the crypto space and a bank-free investment company, you might have noticed a growing trend. Most of the energy companies were using cryptocurrency to enhance fundraising efforts, and I also talked about crowdfunding. Although Bitcoin was inarguably designed to revolutionize currency, its initial appeal was largely as an investment, and cryptocurrency developers continue to focus on new fundraising applications.
The ability to raise money on a massive scale was actually one of mankind’s most important inventions. Before the development of financial systems, the most efficient way to finish monumental projects was by forced labor, either as the result of capture or misdeed, or regular service required by many or all members of society. While ancient wonders have been built this way, it was at great expense, and humans didn’t undertake large projects regularly until the invention of financial systems. Paid work forces are better motivated and trained, but the money was stolen, either as conquests of war, or as taxes from their own people. Seldom was it allocated appropriately.
Ethical musings aside, the main problem was that they couldn’t get as much money as they needed: whether levied at a flat rate or as a percentage of a subject’s wealth, taxation leaves massive amounts of potential funding untouched. Peasants and members of the lower class would starve if their remaining income were taken, and skilled craftsmen or merchants might hide it or flee. Those with money to spare needed to be convinced to part with it willingly, in return for something other than religious reward or nationalism.
Investment itself is at least as old as Hammurabi of Babylon, invented when the first farmer accepted seeds with the promise to repay in crops. It wasn’t until around the time of the Renaissance that merchants started doing this in a large and organized fashion. Eventually, competing monarchs began to encourage these enterprises as sources of tax revenue, and in 1602, the first stock exchange was born. The first public companies sailed the high seas, exploring and colonizing the globe for profit, and then paved the way for the Industrial Revolution.
Stock markets still rule the investment world, and were necessary for all of the technology and infrastructure we have, today. They’ve come a long way from men shouting on the exchange floor, but while automated trading is now a reality, it still has its limitations. Due to the continued reliance on human traders and bureaucrats, we often can’t trade on weekends, and fees are unnecessarily high. Moving funding onto and off of an exchange should be an equally trivial affair. The stock market was revolutionary because it made investment more fluid, inclusive and open, but at the cost of the centralization of the investment business.
Cryptocurrency will bring about the next evolution of fundraising. Bitcoin is already alleviating many of the aforementioned problems, by promoting 24/7 exchanges with speedy and nearly free deposit and withdrawal. Notable exchanges like CAVirtEx have been lowering their fiat trading fees as competition rises, and trading Bitcoin for another cryptocurrency is negligibly cheap, with less inherent restrictions. Better still, Bitcoin has been eroding the monopoly on large-scale charitable projects, previously held by governments and international organizations. Crowdfunding on platforms like Indiegogo has already begun to change this, but Bitcoin will make that easier with low transaction fees, as well as instantaneous donations that can be made on a whim. Pseudo-anonymity also makes it easier to support causes without suffering political repercussions, and Bitcoin-centric crowdfunding websites have emerged left and right.
The upcoming Satoshi Vote is a demonstrable example of such a platform. It has all the bonuses of any other Bitcoin crowdfunding site, with relative anonymity, negligible payment fees and overhead, and the ease of clicking a button. Extreme utilization of Bitcoin’s low transaction fees has enabled a new way to support projects: rather than making a one-time donation, it relies on small ongoing donations over time. Charities that do this already rely on a few donors willing to contribute a significant amount per month, but phrase it as a daily donation. Due to Bitcoin’s revolution of microtransactions, however, it is now possible to send pennies a day, or pennies a month if a large enough crowd of people are ready to contribute. As a bonus, you can cease contributing if and when the charity or project becomes undesirable.
Despite all of these improvements, Bitcoin alone doesn’t solve the larger issue, which is that the fundraising platforms are still centralized. Even if we trust a Bitcoin-based investment vehicle or exchange, they are still in control. Some emerging cryptocurrencies like NoirShares hope to cut out the middleman by going straight to the consumer: NRS is redeemable for equity in the decentralized autonomous projects they’re working on, in addition to being transferable as a normal cryptocurrency. It’s notable for it’s hybrid PW/PoS mining system, in which proof of work is gradually phased out as the network gains strength to conserve energy. As NoirGroup develops more and more profitable decentralized autonomous software, NoirShares becomes more useful.
Developers have also designed coins for non-profit fundraising. CharityCoin gives 10% of all mined coins to democratically-selected charities, which benefit more as the coins increase in value. SwarmCoin lies somewhere in-between, being intended for decentralized crowdfunding in general–holders of swarm coins vote upon which projects to launch on the SwarmCoin network, and Swarm enables those project managers or organizations to launch a coin of their own with no programming knowledge. SwarmCoin holders receive the transaction fees applied to these coins in the form of more SWARM, and can directly exchange those coins for project-specific coins. This would cause a project’s coin to go up in value, making them analogous to stocks or equity, and SwarmCoin not unlike a stock exchange communally owned by those with swarm coins.
These coins effectively represent equity in their associated projects–if more people want them than the issuer and others are selling, the price goes up, along with the value of the issuer’s remaining stash. This leaves one final problem: where do we buy NoirShares or SWARM, or any of the aforementioned cryptocurrency? What if we want to exchange between them? Swarm itself is hosted by another protocol called Counterparty, a next-generation addition to the Bitcoin blockchain that allows a variety of new functions. In addition to the ability to create new coins on the Bitcoin network, Counterparty allows the virtual representation of any currency, asset or equity, and a decentralized way to exchange them with no central authority involved, all on the blockchain. Traditional stock and currency exchanges are now obsolete.
Counterparty’s intermediary currency, XCP, can be directly acquired with Bitcoin, using a process known as “proof of burn.” One might think this could lead to a Bitcoin/XCP monopoly, but Counterparty is only one of many next-generation blockchain applications. Mastercoin (Omni Layer) is also built on top of the Bitcoin protocol, and also allows for decentralized exchange in addition to virtual property. Ethereum is based on its own blockchain, and promises an even wider variety of features, but it’s hard to know which ones will last in the myriad of emerging platforms. Rest assured that Bitcoin 2.0 is coming, and fundraising will never be the same.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
urlhttpi.imgur .com2FVxfXF

Does Dogecoin have the most active community?

Dogecoin, one of the fastest growing cryptocurrency has come a long way since it was first launched as a joke in December 2013. Its growth trajectory has been magnificently fast and the question that many Dogecoin fans have in mind is as follow: Is Dogecoin now the cryptocurrency with the most active community base?
Let’s try to answer these questions by looking at some community statistics with the help of CoinGecko. For this exercise, I will just compare Bitcoin against Dogecoin since from CoinGecko, it is fairly obvious that all the other altcoins are class below Dogecoin.
REDDIT
Based on subscriber count, at time of writing, /r/dogecoin has 87878 subscribers while /r/bitcoin has 122885 subscribers. It seems like Dogecoin is 72% of Bitcoin’s subscriber count.
To look deeper into the involvement of Redditors just in case either of the coin bought some fake subscribers, we will count the average number of new posts and comments per hour that made it to the front page of the coin’s subreddit. The logic behind this is as follow: if there is a high subscriber count but no “real people” following the coin’s subreddit, there will be very little new posts and comments on the front page of the subreddit. So the post and comment count will be a good measure of community activity.
We can see that Dogecoin is pretty much on par with Bitcoin with 2.41 new hot posts versus 2.45 for Bitcoin.
As for comments, Dogecoin portefeuille has 161 compared to Bitcoin’s 266 per hour. These values change quite drastically of course and I have seen Dogecoin average comments per hour reaching well over 1000 on a good day. Some may argue that this is probably because of Dogetipbot but I would say any coin is free to create their own tip bot and use tipping as a community tool.
Lastly, CoinGecko also measures number of Active Online Subscribers on the coin’s subreddit. For this, Bitcoin is a clear winner with 960 users over 390 users for Dogecoin.
Verdict: I would call this a slight win for Bitcoin
FACEBOOK
It is hard to get activity numbers for Facebook other than the Page Likes. Bitcoin has 22450 Likes versus 63380 Likes for Dogecoin.
To analyse further, it may be plausible to count the number of Pages and Groups that have the word “Bitcoin” and “Dogecoin” but this exercise would be much harder to measure.
Verdict: A clear win for Dogecoin
TWITTER
Measuring the follower count of the Twitter accounts of Dogecoin and Bitcoin, we will see that @dogecoin has 165084 followers compared to @bitcoin with 54747. Using this as the only measure we can say that this will point to a clear win for Dogecoin
Using Topsy to compare the number of tweets for Dogecoin and Bitcoin, we will see that Bitcoin has almost 8.5 times more tweets compared to Dogecoin
Verdict: I would give this to Bitcoin because Bitcoin’s Twitter activity is far superior compared to Dogecoin’s.
GOOGLE
Searching “bitcoin” on Google gave me 31.8 million results while searching “dogecoin” gave me 4.63 million results.
Using Google Trends, I can also see the trend on the number of Google searches for “bitcoin” and “dogecoin”. Again Bitcoin is a clear winner – people worldwide are more interested to find out about Bitcoin.
Verdict: A clear win for Bitcoin
FORUMS
This would be tricky to evaluate. Bitcoin has Bitcointalk as the official forum while Dogecoin has a few forums such as Discuss Dogecoin and Doges.org.
Bitcointalk now has 7260963 Posts in 310688 Topics by 327403 Members. Doges.org has 51499 Posts in 9245 Topics by 11028 Members.
Verdict: A clear win for Bitcoin
SO DOES THIS MEAN BITCOIN IS STILL THE CRYPTOCURRENCY WITH THE LARGEST COMMUNITY BASE?
I’m afraid to say that this is indeed true, fellow shibes. We are not the #1 cryptocurrency yet but we are catching up very fast with Bitcoin. On CoinGecko, we have beaten all the other altcoins in terms of community but we must not be complacent and work harder to be reach out to more people and help Dogecoin be the cryptocurrency with the best community!
ABOUT BOBBY CE ONG:
Bobby is the co-founder of CoinGecko, a cryptocurrency ranking website that looks at various metrics beyond market capitalization such as community involvement, developer activity and trading liquidity.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
1MIe8iGDJUvuTrPk0Ds42jQ

Cryptocoins for good: Cryptocurrencies Empowering Citizens Against Oppressive Governments

How cryptocurrencies can change the balance of power between dictators and citizens

For many years currency exchange control has been a distinctive feature of dictatorships, from
the “control by the ruble” of the Soviet Gosbank, to the dual currency
system in Cuba, China’s overvaluation of the Yuan, or the exchange
controls in countries like Venezuela and Iran, regimes of all types have
relied on these kind of controls to rein, or at least try to rein,
capital flights, inevitable when -sooner or later- markets try to
correct the excesses committed by money-hungry “revolutions”.
The Gosbank controlled the currency markets using what it came to be known as the “control by the ruble”
Sadly,
citizens are usually the most affected by such currency controls: as a
pseudo-monopoly is established, a black-market is instantly created and
exchange rates climb inexorably, specially in left-leaning regimes where
the government aims for greater control of all aspects of the economy,
affecting the efficiency of the production system and pushing the
trade-balance the wrong way, increasing in consequence the amount of
foreign currency required to cover internal demand. In short, more
expensive currency is required to buy each time more stuff, the result?
Rampant inflation and even more poverty.
Basic
Marxist theory says that the structure of society must be based in
keeping people in poverty, ruled by an upper class with certain rules,
norms and such in order so they can keep people like that. This
old-proven-wrong-policy is still used by many governments today, in
February 2014, for example, some education minister of a Latin American
country said that the government “wasn’t going to take people out of
poverty so they can become political opponents”. This proves that
currency controls are not a consequence of failed economic policies, but
tools for the governments to exert repressing power over its citizens.
Now,
what would happen to oppressive regimes if they were to lose control of
the currency exchange, so the people is free to manage their wealth
beyond the power of government currency controls? Currency
decentralization is not new, 20th century economist and Nobel Prize
Winner, Friedrich August Von Hayek (F.A. Hayek), theorized extensively
on this subject, and though polemic, his writings provided an important
part of the theoretical framework for modern economics, specially in
areas such as theory of money and economic fluctuations.In his book Theory of Liberty he wrote:

“The
experience of the last fifty years has taught most people the
importance of a stable monetary system. Compared with the preceding
century, this period has been one of great monetary disturbances.
Governments have assumed a much more active part in controlling money,
and this has been as much a cause as a consequence of instability. It is
only natural, therefore, that some people should feel it would be
better if governments were deprived of their control over monetary
policy. Why, it is sometimes asked, should we not rely on the
spontaneous forces of the market to supply whatever is needed for a
satisfactory medium of exchange as we do in most other respects?

It
is important to be clear at the outset that this is not only
politically impracticable today but would probably be undesirable if it
were possible. Perhaps, if governments had never interfered, a kind of
monetary arrangement might have evolved which would not have required
deliberate control; in particular, if men had not come extensively to
use credit instruments as money or close substitutes for money, we might
have been able to rely on a self-regulating mechanism. This choice,
however, is now closed to us. We know of no substantially different
alternatives to the credit institutions on which the organization of
modern business has come largely to rely; and historical developments
have created conditions in which the existence of these institutions
makes necessary some degree of deliberate control of the interacting
money and credit systems (my emphasis). Moreover, other circumstances
which we certainly could not hope to change by merely altering our
monetary arrangements make it, for the time being, inevitable that this
control should be largely exercised by governments”

Governments
have assumed a much more active part in controlling money, and this has
been as much a cause as a consequence of instability
F.A. Hayek
But,
what if it was no longer inevitable? During the 20th century creating
and managing currencies was only possible for governments, so it was in
essence exclusively a political matter, but technology is changing that,
money issuing is not only government turf anymore, they now must
compete with cryptocurrencies. In governments with an effective rule of
law, this can be fair competition, for example, currencies can be
somehow regulated -as the IRS recently did in the US- and a legal
framework can be established so everyone can play by the rules. But,
there are many countries where the line between state and nation is
blurred, these countries may also take two additional paths, they can
prevent financial institutions or businesses from transact with
cryptocurrencies (e.g. Colombia and China) or they can declare an
outright ban (as it is rumored about China every single day). In both
scenarios cryptocoins could have a very important role, in the former
-while remaining legal- they can create a new channel for the flow of
foreign currencies, in the latter they can work as a relief valve, as an
alternative for the black market. In any case, by increasing the supply
of foreign currency, these coins can effectively push prices down, with
all the benefits that comes with it.
For
once, the development model that could arise from an efficient
cryptocoins market presents a development plan that is not based on
plain charity, in giving away something with the hope that the recipient
will make a good use of it and luckily return it back in future
productivity. People cannot only mine their own coins but they can rest
assure that the value of such money will be subject to fair rules of
supply and demand, not to devaluation-based political planning; and most
important, they may not be held hostage in poverty by exchange
controls, giving back to them a little of that sovereignty that
dictators keep claiming or themselves.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
polish flag3

Polish Finance Ministry says Bitcoin can be used as financial instrument

(CoinDesk) Poland’s deputy finance minister Wojciech Kowalczyk has released a
document confirming that under the country’s existing financial
regulations, bitcoin can be considered a financial instrument.
The statement follows a previous inquiry from Michal Pacholski, an
opposition member of Parliament for the liberal Twoj Ruch (Your
Movement) party. At the time, Pacholski asked Poland’s Ministry of
Finance to explain the legal status of bitcoin transactions.
Specifically, his query focused on whether or not “options and futures
contracts can be considered as a financial instrument” if they are
denominated in a digital currency.
The Finance Ministry replied that bitcoin fits within that legal framework, stating:

“Options or futures contracts which are based on
[bitcoin] as a base instrument can be considered as derivative
instruments, and as such, they can be considered as financial
instruments, according to the bill on financial instruments.”

Bitcoin’s legal status clarified

In the notice, Kowalczyk confirmed that bitcoin is not an officially
recognized currency in Poland. He said in the policy document:

“An analysis of national regulations allows to conclude
that bitcoin … is not a legally defined and universally accepted
currency, because it cannot be classified as either a national currency …
or a foreign currency.”

Previously, Pacholski had pressed the Finance Ministry on the
possibility of issuing options and futures contracts in the form of
derivatives based on bitcoin market indexes. These issuances, he said,
would be similar to the derivatives which are based on stock market
indexes.
Kowalczyk’s document confirms that these instruments may be made
available to Polish investors. This, the Finance Ministry said, is in
accordance with the country’s banking services regulations.

Regulators accept bitcoin usage

Ultimately, the Polish government statement on bitcoin’s use in
derivatives markets suggests the continued evolution of government
policy toward digital currencies in Poland. While bitcoin can be used as
a medium of exchange and financial tool, it remains unrecognized as a
legal currency by regulators.
This policy stance has been stated by Poland’s financial regulators in the past, including officials from the Finance Ministry.
Speaking at a seminar held at the Warsaw School of Economics (SGH) in December,
Szymon Wozniak, a Finance Ministry representative, said that the
ministry does not consider bitcoin to be illegal, but it does not
consider it to be a legal currency either. He remarked:

“What is not forbidden is permitted. However, we certainly cannot consider bitcoin to be a legal currency.”

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
700 aHR0cDovL2NvaW50ZWxlZ3JhcGguY29tL3N0b3JhZ2UvdXBsb2Fkcy92aWV3L2NlMmJhOTU2OGY5MzczM2ZhODBkM2IxNmQ1YjBhMzZhLnBuZw

Bitcoin history: pre-blockchain digital currencies

(CoinTelegraph) For anyone not involved in
mid-90s cypherpunk scenes or early e-cash projects, the term “digital
currency” probably never came up in conversation until quite recently,
after the advent of Bitcoin.
But Satoshi’s white paper
did not invent digital money; that’s an idea as old as mainstream
internet usage itself. Bitcoin, and the altcoins it spawned, just
happened to be so revolutionary that all those electronic currencies
pre-2009https://holytransaction.com/page/before-bitcoin get overshadowed.
It’s like the Christian calendar. There is before-Bitcoin (BB), and then there is the current era, (AB).
Let’s take a look at some pre-Bitcoin technologies to get an idea of how far cryptocurrencies have come since.

1990: DigiCash

In 1982, cryptographer David Chaum applied the idea of blind signatures to money in his paper “Blind Signature for Untraceable Payments.”
Eight years later, he took these cryptographic protocols to market with
DigiCash, a company that ultimately went bankrupt in 1998.

1996: E-Gold

E-Gold sounded like a fine idea at the time: Create an account, send
in your gold or silver, and your accounted would be credited. Those
credits could then be easily transferred among accounts. The company
slowly built a successful operation through the late 90s.
By 2001, E-Gold was running into problems, however. The US Patriot
Act, first of all, tightened regulations on businesses that could be
classified as money transmitters. Gaining money transmitter licenses for
all 50 states proved too big of a hassle for E-Gold and its
competitors.
Furthermore, a campaign began to grow against E-Gold that marked it
as the currency of money launderers and child pornographers. A federal
indictment followed in 2005, which marked the end of E-Gold as a
meaningful alternative currency.

1998: Beenz.com

Beenz was a currency created to incentivize behavior such as visiting
specific websites, logging on through specific ISPs or shopping at
certain stores. This was back before the dot-com bubble burst, when
bored teenagers could take online quizzes, and marketing companies would
send them free stuff in the mail.
But the fetten Jahren ran their course, and Beenz.com was gone by 2001.

1999: Flooz.com

Flooz had a similar name and similar model to Beenz: Users were
rewarded for activity with flooz, which served as a medium of exchange
among its network of partners. Like Beenz, also, Flooz went bust in the
dot-com crash.

1999: InternetCash.com

InterenetCash.com filed a number of patents to protect its monetary
system based on prepaid cards, and it also relied on a network of
participating merchants where that cash could be redeemed. The company
ultimately raised $10 million in funding and had a staff of about 70
employees before the dot-com crash forced the company to close in August
2001.
After 2001, when economic realities hit many internet startups hard,
digital money never really caught on again, beyond some niche users,
until Nakamoto published the Bitcoin white paper in 2008. Of course, it
took a few years for most of us in the cryptocurrency community to catch
on, at which point cryptocurrencies took off far beyond what their
predecessors did.

We asked some community experts what present feature or
present reality in cryptocurrency tech today we will find funny and
old-fashioned in 15 years or so?

Aleksey Bragin:
“So many useless (or sometimes funny, as DogeCoin for example) alt
cryptocurrency clones emerged so quickly. That would go out of fashion
quicker than within 15 years, I suppose.”
Gideon Gallasch (coinsulting.eu): “I think mining – so much power and electricity is not sustainable long term.”
Lech Wilczyński (Co-Founder/CEO / Developer at InPay S.A.): “Centralized exchanges.”
J. Ryan Conley (CEO & Founder at Ryan Conley
Marketing & Training and CEO & Founder at Team Extreme
Worldwide): “That the banks were last to catch on to this awesome
concept! Staged viral video marketing platform.”
Patrick Dugan (CIO of Crypto Currency Concepts): “Centralized exchanges for sure, mining possibly.”
Lech Wilczyński (InPay.pl): “Bitcoin payment gateway.”

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi

Blackcoin Announces Proof-of-Stake Protocol v2

The Blackcoin Developers have announced that their coin is adopting what they are calling proof-of-stake protocol v2 in response to concerns from critics that say Proof-of-stake coins aren’t secure.

(CoinTelegraph) Blackcoin is one of the most
exciting altcoins in the cryptospace right now. It has a 30 second
confirmation time, large market cap, their BlackHalo project is keeping
it in the forefront of the Bitcoin 2.0 space and they seem to be the
only team to get altmining pools done in a responsible way that doesn’t
harm other coins.

It is also proof-of-stake based, with its proof-of-work mining period long over. While, as the team and the white paper is quick to point out,
proof-of-stake has been secure enough to prevent any serious security
breaches to its 15 – 20 million dollar market (not to mention the
markets of other proof-of-stake coins like NXTCoin, Peercoin and
Novacoin) there have been some concerns voiced by the community.

Rather than waiting to see if their coin can withstand a serious
attack when potentially hundreds of millions of dollars are on the line
(assuming Blackcoin continues to grow) the developers are taking a
proactive approach and plugging up those potential vulnerabilities now.

Proof-of-stake protocol v2 ditches the somewhat controversial Coinage
system completely. Coinage is a system that has only coins, which have
been moved into a wallet recently (after thirty days but less than
ninety days), accruing interest in the minting process. This system was
designed to encourage transactions and therefore spending. However, it
resulted in a less secure system as nodes were able to gain enough
influence over the system to perform a double spend. There was also an
issue where honest nodes would only remain on while their coins were
gaining interest. More nodes equates to a more secure network, so the
new system is designed to encourage nodes to participate at all times by
not deactivating minting on coins.

Adjustments have also been made to stop pre-computations of
proof-of-stake. Proof-of-stake pre-computations had attackers matching
or exceeding the network hashrates for short amount of times and
rewriting the blockchain to double spend coins they do not yet have.
Blackcoin’s new system addresses this by changing the stake modifier at
every modifier interval.

Blackcoin will also be switching from Scrypt to SHA256d because
Scrypt doesn’t offer any advantages in a proof-of-stake system and since
Blackcoin’s proof-of-work phase is over, it is no longer needed.

The team behind Blackcoin is dedicated, talented and apparently has a
real knack for solving problems.  Steve McKie, Project Manager for the
Blackcoin Development team and representative of the Blackcoin
Foundation stated:

 “With PoS Protocol V2.0, we wanted to plug any searing
vulnerabilities that may have existed in the protocols previous version
that were left over from previous attempts at PoS (Peercoin, NovaCoin).
The main developer of the protocol, Rat 4 (Pavel Vasin) has been hard at
work making sure that BlackCoin users and merchants are as protected as
possible from malicious attacks on the network”

In the same vein, Blackcoin is switching its Timestamp rules from
ones that mirrored Bitcoin’s to one that is designed to take advantage
of the proof-of-stake system. You can see the differences below:

Bitcoin
Past limit: median time of last 11 blocks
Future limit: +2 hours
Granularity: 1 second
Expected block time: 10 minutes
Blackcoin (New rules)
Past limit: time of last block
Future limit: +15 seconds
Granularity: 16 seconds
Expected block time: 64 seconds

McKie and the team have big aspirations for Blackcoin and believe
that the proof-of-stake system will prove to be more effective.
“Proof-of-stake, we believe, will be the leading protocol going forward
in regards to security and overall energy efficiency,” they said.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi

Cryptocurrency Fundamentals

2014 will be a year of revolution, not politically but economically. Sweeping reforms are coming that will forever alter the way our financial system works. In order to understand how cryptocurrency will be so revolutionary, you need to understand who it was made by, why it was made and how it works.

Cryptocurrency – “is a medium of exchange designed around securely exchanging information which is a process made possible by certain principles of cryptography.” (cryptography means keeping information safe by making it into a code)

Imagine there were a group of ten nomadic tribes in a valley with a lot of hills. One day they discover a hundred precious stones all with  unique symbols written on them. To decide how best to regulate trade and prevent theft and fraud, the tribes decide to make it law that whenever a stone is traded between villages, both of the tribes must record it on this huge wooden board placed where the stones were first found with the stone’s unique symbol telling the other villages that that stone has been traded. They do this when no one is looking and keep their stones hidden from each other. If a stone changes hands without it being recorded on the board, then you know it was a theft or fraud.

Leaving the analogy: the tribes are now computers, the smoke signals are the internet, and the precious stones are Bitcoins. Bitcoin is only one of many hundreds, even thousands, cryptocurrencies out there. Cryptocurrency has three main advantages over national currencies like the US Dollar.

1. It is decentralized; the currency is regulated by the market and community, not by a central bank like our Federal Reserve.

2. It is anonymous; users can spend their money on whatever they want without fear of being tracked by the government.

3. It is digital; you do not need to carry them around with you (even though you can).

Bitcoin – is just one of many cryptocurrencies (AKA altcoins, alternative currencies, etc). It was the first and most famous, mainly for its mob associations in the Silk Road. It was created by an individual or group of individuals known as Satoshi Nakamoto (Personally, I think it’s a small team). It has the greatest market capitalization (as in the quantity of Bitcoins times the value of each Bitcoin given in dollars) of all cryptocurrencies.

Here is a visualization of the market capitalizations of all the cryptocurrencies.

Most cryptocurrencies have nothing unique to them. Some may even be scams, but far more are simply unimaginative wannabes. They are developed by anyone from a leading company to a hacker in his parent’s garage (although you can easily tell). The top fifty cryptocurrencies are usually the only ones with anything creative or innovative about them. But to reach the top you cannot merely have creative mechanics or features to your coin, you must have a community. Coins that want to be in the big boys club must reach out to a group of people online who identify with something about the coin. Often it is as simple as having a “cool” name, like the amusingly blatant Potcoin. A community of people who support and use the coin means that it will have consistent trading and mining and will maintain its value. But don’t take that to mean that you don’t need a well-constructed coin itself. Several times has a coin emerged with a huge opening to a lot of fans before suffering from a massive technical failure and breaking down (looking at you Ripplecoin). This is why we should think of cryptocurrencies as investments like high-volatility bonds than actual mediums of exchange for the time being. Volatility will fall with mainstream adoption and market maturation just like with stocks and bonds.

The competition between altcoins is cutthroat. If your coin/exchange/mining pool gets a bad name as a scam then it will be plastered all over the main cryptocurrency forums (don’t knock forums, these are more influential than maintream media news stations in the crypto community) and your coin/exchange/pool will be ruined. If a coin/exchange/pool comes up just like yours but with that little extra awesome thing about it (I mean literally ANYTHING) then your users can easily notice the rival and switch to it. In order to stay profitable a coin/exchange/pool must not only have value innovation when it release but must continue to create more value and innovation for the user.

Mining – mining is how coins are introduced to the market. In incredibly simplified terms, people with computers download a program that solves very very complex algorithms to generate a unique solution. Each solution is recorded in computer-speak, forming a new cryptocurrency coin. To reclarify: this is almost an oversimplification of the process. This can work in two ways: Proof-of-Work, and Proof-of-Stake. In PoW, you get more blocks containing coins the more work you have done mining that coin in the past. In PoS, you get more blocks containing coins the more total coins you own (so if you continue to own 1% of all the coins then you will continue to receive 1% of coins that are mined) Some cryptocurrencies have a hybrid of both, in which people can mine for coins via PoW or receive them via PoS. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.  If you want to challenge your reading comprehension and computer science skills try reading the articles on both linked above.

PoS (Proof of Stake) was first proposed on Bitcointalk here.

You may think it’s kind of unfair and weird that someone can just go
out and mine cryptocurrency coins “for free” using just a computer, that
makes the coin “not backed by anything.” This belief is full of logical
fallacies. Firstly, the miner must spend money to get computers,
internet access, etc in order to even do the process. Then he must spend
time, effort, expertise and electricity generating the coin. Then he
may sell it. Sounds easy? Wrong. You can similarly trivialize the
process of mining gold, or silver, or any other precious metal. All you
have to do is spend some money to buy a pick, a shovel and a pan then go
out to a river in Oregon and squat in it.

Just because something doesn’t require physical labor doesn’t mean it
isn’t hard, or worthless. Not everyone can or wants to mine, that alone
restricts the supply. In addition, the more miners there are, the
higher the difficulty rate goes. The difficulty rate
decides how many coins are given out in a given time to a given miner;
the higher it is, the less coins the miners get. This also helps to
restrict mining. Today the difficulty rate of Bitcoin is so high that
they are completely mined by big companies with powerful non-personal
computers.

Think of each cryptocurrency as its own precious substance like gold
or diamonds. Gold isn’t “backed by anything” either. Your US Dollar is
only backed by your neighbors’ home mortgages and the debt our banks owe
to other banks. Both cryptocurrencies and precious metals can be mined
“for free,” but that doesn’t mean it is not hard to do so. They may not
be “backed by anything” other than human desire, but that doesn’t mean
they are devoid of value.

Blocks/ Blockchains – here
you can see a infographic explaining how the blockchain system within
Bitcoin works. The blockchain is basically a record of everyone who has
owned each Bitcoin, which Bitcoins they owned, and when. It is a perfect
ledger of all transactions. You may say, “but wait what about
anonymity?” Just about to get there. The ledger doesn’t record your
name, your social security number, your fingerprint etc just your wallet
address. This is not the same as your IP address.
Whenever you want you can go online and download a free unique wallet
with its own address (given anonymously) from the website of each
cryptocurrency. This will sit, just like any other file, in your
computer. While you cannot exactly open it and read or copy the data
within (and thus expose Bitcoin to fraud) you can rest easy knowing your
money is at least digitally in front of you. If you just did something
like buying ten porn magazine subscriptions, you can go download another
unique wallet and toss the old one. This ledger is pretty much useless
for tracking all the transactions, but it does help if one wants to
investigate huge sales that happen all at once.

One of the most important things about cryptocurrency is that it is
not controlled by any government. The most they can do is ban or
restrict it in some way by law, which drives down the price of the coin.
However, this is imprecise and as more countries and companies adopt
the technology, not only will the impact of these laws be lessened but
governments will be face more obvious economic incentives not to. The
fearful prohibitions (which don’t even work as evidenced by at least two
of the top ten crypto exchanges being Chinese at all times) are not
evidence of cryptocurrency’s instability. Rather, they are proof of the
lengths governments which heavily manipulate their currency and repress
their people will go to keep this technology out.

Cryptocurrencies’ decentralized system contrasts greatly with
national currencies or fiat currencies like the dollar or euro. The
federal government has a great deal of control over the US Dollar. I’m
not going to go into the federal reserve
here because I’m sure many non-Libertarians roll their eyes when they
see us go into that stuff and it’s too much for this article. But you
can check it out here:

Want to see a debunking of all those scary things you hear about Bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general? Here.

Written by Mars

Tradition. Liberty. Reason.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
bitcoin portrait vienna 1

Max Keiser talks altcoins, investment and political disruption

(CoinDesk) The summer of 2014 is really heating up in the alternative cryptocurrency world. What will the next few months bring for altcoins? We can all agree that, well, nobody is certain. To get a perspective on the possible road ahead, All Things Alt caught up with Max Keiser, host of The Keiser Report, guru for maxcoin, and one of the leading voices behind StartCOIN, a new altcoin-powered crowdfunding initiative.
Read on to see what Keiser had to say about alt investment, maxcoin and the inherent political nature of digital currencies.

The case for altcoins

Keiser suggested that altcoins are a great way for investors to diversify their digital currency performance. He said that he maintains “a diversified portfolio of coins, with bitcoin being the biggest portion”, adding that he believes “alts offer a great way to have exposure to different segments”.
He explained:

“Altcoins offer ways to gain exposure to different segments of the crypto-universe. Dash is a brilliant coin that addresses a real need. As I said before, the market as a whole is set for 100x growth so there is plenty of upside.”

When asked whether or not it is ethical to promote altcoin investment, as large price swings can lead to losses, Keiser offered, “I’m like Warren Buffet. I talk about the coins I myself own including maxcoin”.

The future of maxcoin

Some critics have said that Keiser abandoned maxcoin, leaving its reputation – and price – up to the whims of market movers. Keiser conceded that the development team was “overwhelmed at the launch”. However, he rejected the idea that the project was a failure and said that things are still going on behind the scenes that could produce some positive results if successful.
He elaborated:

“In the case of maxcoin, this was a coin that was started by students at Bristol University who I don’t think were prepared for the huge interest they got but I supported them and continue to do so because they’re very talented and we’re still very early in the game.”

Keiser added that he thinks “we’ll see a return to the old highs before the end of the year” and that “it’s probably a good buy at these levels”.

Bitcoin still the king

On the other hand, Keiser believes that while altcoins have a role to play, ultimately it is bitcoin that will remain the top digital currency.
He remarked:

“Let me be clear. Everybody should have, as their core holding, some bitcoin. Bitcoin is here to stay and is set to top $400 billion. I agree with the Winklevoss twins on this.”

Still, Keiser said that alts remain a significant part of the future of digital currency. He touched on the political ramifications of digital currencies, which ties into the concept of decentralization that is being realized in crowdfunding and eCommerce projects currently in development. Additionally, Keiser said that alts – along with bitcoin – will contribute to the broader, long-term shift away from fiat currencies in favor of digital currencies.
He concluded:

“As long as Amir [Taaki] and his followers are around, bitcoin and alt coins will be pushing the political envelope and God bless them. We need as much political disruption as can get these days.”

Strange alt of the week

Last week, we look at several altcoins that celebrated the arrival of the FIFA World Cup. While those didn’t fall into the unusual category per-say, they were notable for the fact that they existed largely to promote a temporary event.
Perhaps these belong to a class of coins unironically dubbed ‘commemorative coins’, but all the same, it’s possible that we might see more coins of a similar nature as important events develop. An upcoming coin release suggests this may be so, as cantorcoin, an alt that seemingly celebrates the momentous (and in many books historic) political loss of US Congressman and former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor in a primary election. With the slogan “Moderately Rare – Conservatively Secure”, cantorcoin has earned this week’s Strange Alt of the Week award.
Notably, cantorcoin’s max supply count is 100,614 coins. According to a development statement posted on CryptoCoinsTable.com, this number is meant to represent the “the 10th day of the 6th month of the year 2014”, or 10th June of this year. This is the same day as the Republican primary that cost Eric Cantor his seat in the next Congress, later all but forcing him to resign his leadership post.
As well, the developer states that there is no premine. They estimated that the total amount of cantor coins will go quickly and become “a collectible coin”, saying that any available coins will “disappear quicker that water drops on Route 66”.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
Xr6eoLf

McShibe! McDonalds Dogecoin burger approved for judging

Back in May, the Dogecoin community decided to take advantage of a competition McDonalds was hosting and tried to add a Dogecoin themed burger to the McDonalds menu. The competition is simple: design a burger online, pick the ingredients, and name it. The top voted burgers would be selected for judging and the winning burgers would sold in McDonalds restaurants for a week.

http://i.imgur.com/Xr6eoLf.jpg

Early Troubles

Initially, multiple variations of the “Dogecoin” burger were submitted for entry. Examples include the McDogecoin, the McDoge, and the Doge Burger. Despite having been voted to the top, McDonalds had to remove most of these entries due to the name. In hindsight, this decision makes a lot of sense. Some customers (especially those who aren’t aware of the Doge meme) would find it very strange if McDonalds started selling “Doge” burgers all of a sudden.

Redemption

Of all the entries, the McShibe burger was the most tame and an announcement earlier today disclosed that McDonalds had selected the burger and invited the contestant to the kitchen.

Details

The judging will be held on June 29th and 11 other finalists will be invited. Of these 11, judges will select the top 5. These top 5 burgers will be made available on the UK McDonalds menu for a period of one week each.

Conclusion

Well — I guess we can add this to the eternal list of amazing things Dogecoin has done. It remains to be seen whether or not the judges will actually select the burger (or how good it actually tastes). Hopefully one of the judges is secretly a Shibe.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
BlackCoinFibreOptic1

BlackCoin Team developer creates true smart contracts and a decentralized exchange for Bitcoin and BlackCoin

A member of the BlackCoin development team has created a new method for eliminating risk during peer-to-peer transfers. This revolutionary protocol, called BitHalo for Bitcoin and BlackHalo for BlackCoin, will be not only the world’s first “smart contracts” client, but also make contracts unbreakable.
 

BlackCoin, a top 10 digital currency by market cap that secures its network entirely through proof of stake, announced today that a member of the BlackCoin development team has created a new method for eliminating risk during peer-to-peer transfers. This revolutionary protocol, called BitHalo for Bitcoin and
BlackHalo for BlackCoin, will be not only the world’s first “smart contracts” client, but also make contracts unbreakable.

Unbreakable contracts will protect Bitcoin users from future Mt.Gox-type collapses. They will also provide a number of other benefits in the financial world including eliminating derivative markets volatility, the creation of decentralized exchanges that do not depend on a “middle” coin, unhackable wallets, good faith employment contracts, real world bartering, backing of commodities such as Bitcoin cash, and two party escrow.
BitHalo and BlackHalo will make Bitcoin and BlackCoin the first digital currencies to feature smart contracts. The protocols do not require the use of any central server or host to organize the transactions. The protocol itself takes advantage of BlackCoin’s scripting system, meaning no changes are required to the Bitcoin network for it to run, and that immediate adoption is possible. The program uses “Double Deposit Escrow,” which encourages parties to complete real world deals in good faith by making the reward lower than the value of default. This process allows contract bridges to form, as well as micropayment channels, allowing for potentially unlimited transactions under the same contract. Once the deposits are set up, the actual exchange begins.
BitHalo/BlackHalo developer David Zimbeck said, “The protocol uses risk, reward and agreement to circumvent malleability, which was ironically once thought to prevent these types of protocols. Almost every sector of the economy that involves third parties runs the risk of loss to the consumer. This protocol now gives individuals full control over who they decide to trust and how they decide to structure that trust.”
Zimbeck continued: “I chose BlackCoin because of its fast transaction times, a massive advantage when engaged in contracting. Bitcoin transactions can take well over ten minutes for their first confirmation, while BlackCoin normally confirms in well under a minute. Trust and agreement are the basis of society so this technology affects everyone.”
The BitHalo and BlackHalo applications will become the basis for an umbrella app called NightTrader. NightTrader builds on top of BitMessage and allows for decentralized order books, servers and native communication protocols. NightTrader focuses on “agreement” between computers by filtering messages. Peer-to-peer U.S. Dollar and Chinese Yuan exchanges will be an immediate feature in the client.
BlackCoin
is a transparent and accessible digital currency that operates entirely through proof of stake. Proof of stake offers a number of advantages over proof of work systems including much faster confirmation times, less selling pressure due to its unminable protocol, and independence from expensive and energy-intensive mining. The digital currency is supported by the BlackCoin multipool, which pays out in BlackCoin. The BlackCoin Foundation consists of a worldwide network of brand ambassadors, who lead a vibrant international community of BlackCoin advocates.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi