Category Archive: Articles

coinSummit

Third CoinSummit to be held in London

The Third CoinsSummit is to be held in London this July. San Francisco was the acting ground of the previous CoinSummit convention that was held in March; as the second convention presented, this next summit will feature a series of panel discussions and speeches from bitcoin enthusiasts, hedge fund professionals, VC and angel investors, and experienced cryptocurrency entrepreneurs.

The information posted on the CoinSummit official site:

“CoinSummit London is a two-day event connecting virtual currency entrepreneurs, angel and VC investors, hedge fund professionals and others who are looking to learn and network in the virtual currency industry. CoinSummit will take place on July 10-11 2014 at the East Wintergarden London.”

Some notable speakers include Silk Road Equity co-founder Matthew Roszak, new Bitcoin Foundation board of director Brock Pierce, angel investor Roger Ver, and Maidsafe CEO David Irvine. Some of the others participants include Megabigpower founder David Carlson, Lamassu CEO Zach Harvey, eToro CEO Yoni Assia, and many others.

This 3rd CoinSummit, organizers are presenting a new set. Besides the usual structure, a special platform is being organized for a few startup companies. Coinsummit has informed at their site, that ten startups will be given the chance to present in front of the entire CoinSummit audience and will be chosen on the basis of the size and charm of the opportunity they are designing, the strength of the team, and their traction / metrics / achievements.

The summit is organized by Pamir Gelenbe, a strongly firmed crypto currencies entrepreneur and partner at Hummingbird Ventures. After the last summit in March, Gelenbe has stated:

“We hope to bring together entrepreneurs, VC investors and folks from hedge funds who want to learn about bitcoins as an asset class…we really want to focus on the business side of Bitcoin as we don’t think there has been an event like this before.”

CoinSummit has been the leading hand on taking Bitcoin discussion to higher grounds by cementing the bonds between the Bitcoin communities around the world and relaying trustworthy information to the media and business investors.

CoinSummit London 2014, will be held at the East Wintergarden and take place on July 10-11. Entrance to the conference is invite-only. Digital currency enthusiasts and entrepreneurs who wish to attend the event can request an invitation on the summit’s official site; applying for the presentation is free and the deadline to register is June 20.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
images

Bitcoin 2014: Building the Digital Economy

(CoinReport) Heads up folks! Bitcoin 2014: Building the Digital Economy conference is being held in Amsterdam from May 15 to 17.

Bitcoin 2014

Bitcoin 2014 is an “annual international forum, exhibition and networking conference organized by the Bitcoin Foundation for the fintech industry.”
It will be a meeting place for investors, technologists, regulators,
executives, entrepreneurs, developers, and policymakers to gather and
discuss the future of digital currency around the world.
The first bitcoin 2013 conference
was held in Silicon Valley in San Jose California. The conference had a
spectacular turnout of over 1,200 attendees, speakers, and exhibitors.
It featured bitcoin investors Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss as keynote
speakers.One of the topmost fintech hubs in Europe, Amsterdam serves as a great place for this year’s momentous event to take place.
https://bsidebtc.com/

 

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
bitcoinindipendance

The Declaration of Bitcoin’s Independence

(BitcoinMagazine)  We have been brought to a point where it has become necessary to dissolve the bond between currency and institution. We are not required to declare the causes which impel us to push for the separation, but we will oblige.
But we are in an age of appropriation, and nothing is immune. Today bitcoin is not only volatile in its value, but in its very essence. Bitcoin is in the crucial stages of development. Its code can evolve in several directions. It’s under threat from those who don’t understand it; it’s under threat from those who do understand it, but fear it. We hold these truths to be self-evident. We have been cyclically betrayed, lied to, stolen from, extorted from, taxed, monopolized, spied on, inspected, assessed, authorized, registered, deceived, and reformed. We have been economically disarmed, disabled, held hostage, impoverished, enervated, exhausted, and enslaved. And then there was bitcoin.
The crusade to absorb bitcoin into the seams of the State has begun. There is a conscious effort to co-opt. The goal is to swallow bitcoin, process it, integrate it, devolve it, and keep it stagnant in the gears of a failed operating system. Bitcoin’s potential is being hijacked. They have their own idea of what they want bitcoin to be. They have their own plan for its potential, and they have an investment in that plan. But our consent is withdrawn and the power of our ideas is too strong.
Do not underestimate DNA; nothing is born completely neutral. Follow the protocol: it has anarchistic implications. Bitcoin is inherently anti-establishment, anti-system, and anti-state. Bitcoin undermines governments and disrupts institutions because bitcoin is fundamentally humanitarian. There’s an elimination of 3rd party intrusion. It’s purely peer-to-peer. The blockchain is free speech. It’s decentralized, voluntary, and non-aggressive. Bitcoin is not supposed to work within our current mechanisms. Bitcoin needs not entities of authority to acknowledge it, incorporate it, regulate it, and tax it. Bitcoin does not pander to power structures, it undermines them.
Bitcoin is an animal of anonymity. Bitcoin basks in shadow. Satoshi’s facelessness is symbolic of this. Privacy is the point. Bitcoin is meant to function outside of regulatory systems. It is not a cog.
Bitcoin means to channel economic power directly through the individual. This is reflected by Satoshi’s symbolic birthday, which falls on the same day that Roosevelt signed the 6102 Executive Order, which forbade the hoarding of gold. We repeat. Bitcoin is not intended to be integrated; it’s intended to be a ghost outside the machine.
The voices of the people who are working to preserve the purity of bitcoin’s ethos are being drowned out. But actions speak louder than words. Bitcoin is utility. The cypherpunks are building anonymous systems. The crypto-anarchists are making institutions arbitrary. The internet is anarchy. And cryptocurrencies are the printless fingers of the internet.
Bitcoin is not just a currency, a commodity, or a convenience. Just like the internet gave information back to the people, Bitcoin will give financial freedom back to the people. But that’s only the first step. There will be a shift in the structure of enterprise, in the way we interact, in the way we voice our opinions, and in the way we fuel our action. Bitcoin will allow us to shape the world without having to ask for permission. We declare bitcoin’s independence. Bitcoin is sovereignty. Bitcoin is renaissance. Bitcoin is ours. Bitcoin is.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
mining farm

Why Bitcoin miners are moving to tiny towns in Washington state

(Gizmodo.in) There’s not much in rural Washington, but there are lot of dams. And dams mean hydroelectric power. Following the lure of cheap electricity, Bitcoin miners and their power-hungry server farms are making out for sleepy little towns in the Pacific Northwest. Although Bitcoin is a digital currency, mining it still has a gigantic physical footprint. That’s because computers “mine” Bitcoin by solving a cryptographic equation. To mine more Bitcoin, you need more computing power. Or you can just have more computers. This is what a “multi-GPU mining rig”-basically a bunch of processors hacked together-looks like.
Powering up and cooling all those processors requires a lot of –you guessed it– electricity. Last year, Bitcoin miners were sucking up an estimated 1 million kilowatt-hours per day. That’s a hefty electric bill right there. But Washington has some of the lowest electricity rates in the country-less than 2 cents per kilowatt-hour for industrial customers in certain area. The average U.S. household pays something more like 12 cents a kilowatt-hour.
Big tech companies running big data centers have been in on the state’s cheap electricity for a while now. Dell, Yahoo, Microsoft, and Intuit all run data centers in Grant County, Washington. But Bitcoin mining’s reliance on intense computing power means even a small operation-relative to a behemoth like Microsoft, at least-needs a giant building full of servers. MegaBigPower, which has considered itself the largest Bitcoin-mining business in the U.S., has a Washington outpost.
Grant County says it has two Bitcoin mining companies operating, with five more to come. The engineers who first built Washington’s dams could not have possibly anticipated Bitcoin mania, yet those dams are now drawing some of the currency’s biggest backers. This is a modern gold rush, shaped by the electric infrastructure we built long ago.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
blockchain_healthcare

A Network analyst’s view of the Blockchain

Martin Harrigan is a computer scientist and software developer. He is the founder of QuantaBytes, an Irish startup developing a suite of tools for analyzing and visualising bitcoin’s block chain. He is also the co-author of one of the earliest academic papers to study the network properties of the block chain and its implications for anonymity.

abstract network
(CoinDesk) The
block chain is a decentraliced, consensus-driven ledger of every
successful bitcoin transaction to date. As of the 300,000th block, the
ledger includes over 38 million transactions.
Aside from being a
monumental technical achievement, the block chain is a fascinating
dataset. We can use it to create a transaction network that models the
flow of bitcoins from the creation of the genesis block to the present
day.
In this network, every node represents a transaction, and
every (directed) edge represents a flow of bitcoins from an output of
one transaction to an input of another. This large, complex network has
over 38 million nodes and 85 million edges.
transaction network
The transaction network represents the flow of bitcoins between transactions over time.
Network science
Network
science is the study of complex networks. It provides theories,
techniques and tools that help us understand the structure and evolution of a network.
The bitcoin transaction network is a prime example. Its basic building
block, the transaction, can be combined to produce complex transfers of
value. This is reflected in the topological structure of the transaction
network.
The network as a whole is too large and complex for most
network visualisation tools. However, we can measure various structural
properties of the network. For example, transactions can be
characterised by their varying numbers of inputs and outputs. But how
are these numbers distributed in practice? In the transaction network,
we can analyse the in- and out-degrees of the nodes. We can plot the in-
and out-degree distributions. They show, for each possible degree, the
number of times they occur in the network.
The in-degree distribution of the transaction network
The in-degree distribution of the transaction network.
The out-degree distribution of the transaction network.
The out-degree distribution of the transaction network.
In
both cases, we observe inverse relationships between these numbers. The
lower the degree, the more frequently the nodes with that degree occur;
the higher the degree, the less frequently they occur. There are many
outliers. The outlier in the out-degree distribution with out-degree
equal to two is due to an abundance of transactions with exactly two
outputs.

Giant connected component

Suppose we were able to
visualise the entire bitcoin transaction network. It would probably
resemble a “hairball”. These visualisations suffer from cluttering and
over-plotting to an extreme that makes them unusable for any practical
purposes. However, they do provide one key piece of information. Are we
dealing with one large connected component or several smaller connected
components?
Many visualizations of large networks are "hairballs".
Many visualizations of large networks are “hairballs”.
A
connected component is a group of nodes and edges that are all
connected to each other, either directly or indirectly. If a network has
a giant connected component, this means that almost every node is
reachable from almost every other node. If we ignore the direction of
the edges in the bitcoin transaction network, then it does indeed
contain a giant connected component covering over 99.9% of all nodes.
The second largest connected component has just 71 nodes.

Fourteen degrees of separation

Six
degrees of separation is the theory that everyone on the planet is
connected to everyone else through a chain of acquaintances with no more than six hops.
In network science terminology, this translates to the theory that the
social network of the human race has diameter six. Facebook reported that the effective diameter (covering 90% of all pairs of users) of its social network is five and is decreasing with time.
The
equivalent number for the bitcoin transaction network is fourteen and
is increasing with time. That is, across 90% of all pairs of
transactions, the shortest path between them in the transaction network,
ignoring directionality, is at most fourteen hops. The increasing value
is likely due to the fact that, unlike the Facebook social network,
there is no preferential attachment.
New nodes are connected to existing nodes whose corresponding
transactions are not yet fully redeemed. In other words, the transaction
network is growing at the frontier only.

The first currency with a ledger

Surprisingly,
bitcoin is not the first currency with a ledger from which we can model
the transfer of value. The Tomamae-cho community currency was
introduced into the Hokkaido Prefecture in Japan for a three-month
period during 2004-05 in a bid to revitalise the local economy. The
Tomamae-cho system involved gift certificates that were reusable and
legally redeemable into yen. There was an entry space on the reverse of
each certificate for recipients to record transaction dates, their names
and addresses, and the purposes of use, up to a maximum of five
recipients.
Researchers collected these certificates in order to
derive a network structure that represented the flow of currency during
the period. They showed, for example, that the network had small world properties.
A network representation of the transfer of value with a community currency.
A network representation of the transfer of value with a community currency.
Source: Network Analyses of the Circulation Flow of Community Currency
The
block chain is a digital equivalent to the Tomamae-cho certificates. It
does not contain information such as names and addresses or the
purposes of use. However, it has other properties that make it suitable
for analysing the transfer of value including its accuracy, size, and
completeness.
The application of network analysis to the block
chain is an under-explored, yet fascinating area. There are a handful of
academic studies but very little in the way of software and tools to
open it up to a wider audience. QuantaBytes  is an Irish startup, founded by the author,
developing a suite of tools for analysing and visualising bitcoin’s
block chain. By understanding the structure and evolution of the block
chain, we can better understand bitcoin’s usage patterns, economy, and
the growth of the system as a whole.
Network image via Shutterstock

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi

What is Bitcoin and how can it change the world?

(Virgin) When you type a website
address into a browser you might have noticed that the letters ‘http’ appear at
the front. ‘Http’ stands for Hypertext Transfer Protocol. In typing a web
address you are actually sending an HTTP command to transmit that website to
you. Hypertext Transfer Protocol is the means by which information is shared
across the Web.
Similarly, when setting up
an email account, you might have noticed the letters ‘smtp’ – for example,
‘smtp.gmail.com.’ SMTP stands for Simple Mail Transfer Protocol. SMTP is the protocol
by which we send emails to each other.
A protocol is the means by
which information is shared across a network. Bitcoin – with a capital ‘B’
– is another protocol. The function of the protocol is to send and receive
payment. The unit of money on the protocol is the ‘bitcoin’ – with a small
‘b’.
You earn a bitcoin by
doing or selling something in exchange for bitcoins – just as you would earn
normal money. If I do this job for you, you pay me in bitcoins. You buy
bitcoins just as you would buy and sell foreign currency. You pay some money to
someone, usually at a Bitcoin exchange, for which you receive some
bitcoins. And you can make your own bitcoins by mining them – more on that
another day.
Image from gettyimages
You keep your bitcoins in
a wallet. There are hundreds of places to get a wallet, just as there are
hundreds of places to get an email account (blockchain.info is as good a place
to start as anywhere). Often people will have more than one wallet – one on
their computer, another with a Bitcoin service provider.
So how can Bitcoin change
the world?
The reason the Bitcoin
technology is potentially so disruptive and transformative is that it’s a new,
efficient form of money. And money, which has been, inexplicably, ignored by
mainstream economists for so long, is, of course, at the heart of almost
everything we do. Bitcoin could change the way the way we make and receive
payment, it could change the way we store money; it even has the potential to
change the actual money we use.
Think about the
possibilities of that for a second. We no longer need banks to store our
money – we store it on our computer with a Bitcoin service provider. We no
longer need banking networks to send or receive money – we just send money as
we would send an email. We no longer need governments to issue our money.
Forget pounds and dollars, we’ll use bitcoins instead. The social implications
of governments and banks losing control of money are considerable. This is
all very well in theory. What will make Bitcoin irresistible in practice is its
sheer efficiency.
Goldman Sachs IT analyst,
Roman Leal, has calculated the savings that Bitcoin could have made in
electronic payment in 2013, if Bitcoin had been used. Let’s start with simple
money transfer – sending money from one person to another.
Consumers currently pay a
fee of about 10% of the total amount transferred if they use a traditional
money transfer network such as Western Union. This fee covers agents’
commissions, forex and access to the network. With Bitcoin, that fee would be
zero – or 1% if you use a Bitcoin service provider. There
were $550 billion of remittances in 2013 generating $49 billion of transaction
fees. With Bitcoin those fees fall by 90% to just $5.5 billion. That would
mean an extra $43 billion actually makes it into people’s pockets.
Image from gettyimages
As for electronic payments
in retail, currently retailers pay from about 2.5% to 3% in fees. In 2013,
global transaction fees were $260 billion on over $10 trillion of sales. Had
Bitcoin been used (again using a 1% estimated figure) the number would be $104
billion – a saving of almost $150 billion.
Leal notes that all
‘merchants would realize sizable savings’ by using Bitcoin, but small merchants
will benefit most. They ‘can reduce their payment processing fees by at least
half’. For a business that runs on low margin that is a compelling
number. These kinds of savings are irresistible.

Then there are those who
are currently shut out of the current financial system. 53% of the world’s
population is still ‘unbanked’ – they have no use of formal or semi-formal
financial services. Most of them will have a mobile phone before they have a
bank account. With Bitcoin – and other forms of digital payment – these people suddenly
have means to make and receive payment over distance. How much untapped
potential is there waiting to be freed when the unbanked start to get access to
basic financial services?
We’re not there yet
The core protocol of
Bitcoin is sound. In fact, it has unprecedented reliability and security. The
edges, however, are vulnerable. Third parties, such as Mt. Gox, have not
figured out how to act like proper financial institutions. Certain operating
systems using the protocol are insecure, rendering bitcoins vulnerable to
theft. There are also issues with programmers who have failed to understand how
the blockchain – the Bitcoin central database – works.
But these are all issues
that will be dealt with as the technology develops. The point is the core
protocol is sound. It – or some replication of it – could send banks to the
same forgotten part of town that the Internet has sent newspapers, as well as
freeing up the possibility for many millions of people to better their lot
through trade and exchange.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
ripple network protocol1

Ripple explained: medieval banking with a digital twist

The Live Ripple Network Can be Visualised Here

(CoinDesk) What is Ripple? Well, it is both a digital currency and a payments protocol, and it is the latter that has got people excited.
Ripple has been hitting the news recently, with banks saying it has promise, and even for the first time starting to use it for services. But many people don’t understand it, so how does it work, exactly?
A good parallel is the hawala network
a traditional, non-digital way of sending money from city to
city. Hawala has its roots in medieval Arabia, and is still in use today
in places where banks won’t or can’t operate.

A medieval banking system

Hawala
is best described as money transmission without money movement,
providing the appearance of instant remittance between separate
locations; for example, sending money between different cities or
countries.
In the basic case, say Alex wants to send money to Beth:
  • Alex goes to his local hawala agent and gives him some cash and a password, which he and Beth share.
  • The agent telephones Beth’s local agent and tells him to release funds to someone who can provide the password.
  • Beth walks in to her agent, says the password, and receives cash. Commissions can be taken from either or both agents.
Ripple_medieval_1
Note
that money has been transmitted from Alex to Beth, but the physical
notes have not moved. We are left in a situation where Alex’s agent owes
Beth’s agent money.
They can either settle the debt later, or
hope that there may be reverse transactions if other clients want to
move money in the opposite direction.
Also note that trust is involved. In this scenario, there are three trust relationships:
  1. Alex has to trust that his agent will do the right thing, as he is handing over cash.
  2. Beth has to trust that her agent will do the right thing, as she is expecting to receive cash.
  3. The agents need to trust each other over the repayment of the debt (IOUs).

Moving to Ripple

Now
we can have websites or shops that perform the function of agents, and
instead of agents phoning each other, we can communicate the IOUs
electronically.
This is how Ripple works: Alex logs on to his
preferred Ripple gateway, deposits money to it, and instructs them to
release funds to Beth via her gateway. Beth collects her funds.
You now understand Ripple. Simple eh?

Not just cash

In the example above, we talked about cash. Now this can also work with physical gold.
So
long as both gateways are prepared to accept and hand out the precious
metal, and the gateways have a trust relationship that allows the IOUs
of gold (as opposed to IOUs of cash in the first example), the network
still works, and you can transmit gold.
Alex gives gold, Beth receives gold, and Alex’s agent owes Beth’s agent gold.
You now understand that Ripple can work for gold, not just money.

Anything goes

Now replace the word ‘gold’ with ‘anything’.
Now, you can transmit anything without moving it, so long as both gateways are set up to deal in it.
This
works best for non-perishable, fungible goods (cash is good, gold is
OK, as are cryptocurrencies, but can also be extended to beer and
flowers, if the gateways want to deal in them.
You now understand that Ripple can transfer anything.

Conversion of goods

If
either gateway is prepared to exchange cash with gold (ie: act as a
gold trader, or ‘market maker’ in Ripple terminology), then Alex can put
cash in at his gateway and Beth can get gold out at hers.
You now understand that Ripple can also morph stuff.

No direct trust? Find a chain

What if Alex’s gateway doesn’t have a trust relationship with Beth’s gateway?
So
long as there are intermediary gateways who can form a chain of trust
for the object being passed (cash, or gold, or whatever), the
transaction will work.
The Ripple algorithm tries to find the
shortest trust path between the gateways. So, thinking back to hawala,
Alex’s agent may not trust Beth’s agent, but there may be a third agent
who trusts the other two. So there will be two IOUs: Alex’s agent owes
the third agent, who owes Beth’s agent.
Ripple_medieval_2

No chain of trust? Use ripples.

What if the network can’t find any chain of trust between the two gateways at all for the cash or goods in question?
This is where ‘ripples’ (XRP) come in. XRP is the ‘currency of last resort’ for the ripple network.
All
gateways provide a price in XRP of anything they deal in (for example: a
dollar is 200 XRP; 1 oz of gold might be 260,000 XRP).
You could say, USD is the currency of last resort in the USA – that is, everything has a price in USD.
This
means, within the Ripple network, you can convert anything to a number
of XRPs, transfer the XRPs via the trust chains, then convert back at
the end gateway, if needed.

XRP is not just a currency of last resort

As well as being a ‘bridging currency’ or a ‘currency of last resort’, XRP also has other notable benefits.
Firstly,
XRP as a currency settles immediately, so when it’s sent on the
Ripple network, the ownership of the actual asset changes – so it’s
final and trustless.
This is in contrast to IOUs, which, although
transferred instantly, still need to be redeemed from a gateway. This
gives rise to counterparty credit risk, as it needs you to trust that
the gateway will fulfill its obligations.
Secondly, transfers of XRPs over ripple incur fewer and smaller transaction fees, as there are fewer intermediaries needed.

Who owes who?

Who
is keeping track of all the IOUs? In the hawala system, each agent
keeps their own ledger, and they are reconciled periodically within
their network of trust.
In Ripple, a public ledger of accounts,
balances, and IOUs are kept updated by everyone simultaneously in the
Ripple network, which is a distributed collection of servers around the
world.
The servers agree on changes by consensus (effectively: “Do
we all agree this transaction can take place?”). There is no central
‘authority’ who says yes or no to transactions, and anyone can be a
server by running free software on their computer.

That’s just the beginning

There
is more here, and as you dig, you’ll learn about market makers, who
provide prices at which they are prepared to trade between goods (for
example, cash for gold, gold for silver, silver for XRP, XRP for GBP,
and so on).
You’ll start to understand why every transaction costs
a small number of XRP (a 1/1000 of a cent, to stop transaction spam),
and that the network is pre-lubricated with 100 billion XRPs.
You’ll
discover the elegance of confirmation via consensus. You’ll learn that
transactions based on cryptography on a distributed network with public
ledgers is faster, cheaper, lower risk, and much, much better in almost
every way possible than centralised pre-Internet correspondent banking
messaging networks such as SWIFT, that some financial institutions
currently operate on. You’ll learn much, much more.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
bitcoin_in_2016

Bitcoin’s promise goes far beyond payments

(HarvardBusinessReview) Digital currencies like Bitcoin have captured the attention of
the media, entrepreneurs, and regulators. The coverage has described
exchange meltdowns, price volatility, and government crackdowns.
However, the focus on Bitcoin as a currency may distract businesses and
governments from its disruptive impact: as a technology.
Bitcoin is more than just a new way to make purchases. It is a
protocol for exchanging value over the internet without an intermediary.
Bitcoin is based on a public ledger system, known as the blockchain,
which uses cryptography to validate transactions. Bitcoin users gain
access to their balance through a password known as a private key. As a
result, Bitcoin is peer-to-peer and open, yet secure and nearly
frictionless. Much has been written about the payment applications of
Bitcoin, including remittances, micropayments, and donations.
However, Bitcoin could disrupt other systems that rely on
intermediaries with a similarly open, peer-to-peer system, including
property, contracts, and identity management.
Anywhere a transaction between two parties has traditionally required
third party validation, Bitcoin may be applicable. Consider these three
common actions:

Transfer of property. The Bitcoin protocol could
simplify complex asset transfers, revolutionizing the services that
support this industry. Currently, the transfer of large assets requires
significant time and resources. For example, in order to purchase a car
from an individual seller, one has to engage a third party to transfer
the title. Additionally, one has to use services like Carfax to learn
about the car’s accident and inspection history. And who doesn’t like to
spend a Saturday at the DMV updating a car registration?
The blockchain could change all of this. Bitcoins can be qualified in
such a way that they represent real-world assets. Bitcoin entrepreneurs
at companies like Colored Coin
are already working on ways to use small portions of Bitcoin to denote
physical property. A fraction of a Bitcoin would publicly identify who
currently owns that property, and could include a record of both past
ownership and other history about the property. When purchasing the car,
one would be able to verify all accidents and inspections over the
blockchain and transfer the title on site. Similarly, real estate and
financial instrument transactions could all be executed over Bitcoin.
This could soon create efficiencies and reduce friction by allowing
individuals to directly transfer property without the use of a broker,
lawyer, or notary to sign-off on the transfer.

Execution of contracts. Bitcoin could similarly be
used to structure contracts, bringing new efficiency and transparency.
Contracts are typically developed by lawyers on a case-by-case basis
with significant time and resources devoted to negotiation, development,
and enforcement. Additionally, markets based on contracts, including
certain financial derivatives markets, lack transparency, which
complicates regulation.
Traditional contracts could be replaced by code, executing themselves
when a triggering event occurs. In a simple example, a financial
instrument, like an option, could be developed and executed over the
blockchain. In addition to reducing legal fees, this could bring new
transparency to financial markets, as regulators could use the public
ledger to understand the market without forcing individual actors to
reveal their specific positions. It is possible that new
crypto-currencies will emerge to serve these niche purposes.
New ventures, like Ethereum, are creating these capabilities today. Ethereum is developing a network to serve as both the registry and escrow to execute the conditions of a contract automatically through checkable rules.

Identity management. Bitcoin’s cryptography could also transform identity management. Much of identity management, including passports, still operates on a paper-based system.
These documents are frequently forged and stolen. Interpol’s database
currently lists 39 million stolen travel documents. Instead of carrying
paper documents, what if there was a way to create a unique, verifiable
key that was impossible to forge?
A cryptographic network similar to but separate from Bitcoin could be
used to verify individuals’ identities and monitor movement across
borders. When a person travels through a checkpoint at a border
crossing, instead of showing and scanning a paper passport, she could
present her private Bitcoin key. A network privately maintained by the
government could verify the key and register the entry into the ledger.
This system, based on cryptography instead of paper documents, would
simultaneously increase mobility and security. If Bitcoin can be used
for travel documents, it could also be used for other forms of identity
management like social security numbers, tax identification numbers, or
even driver’s licenses.
Property, contracts, and identity management are only a few examples
of how a peer-to-peer, open, and frictionless system could change how we
conduct business in the future. In order to achieve this wider
adoption, Bitcoin will need to address significant questions around
trust, ease of use, and operability. However, the Bitcoin community has
shown remarkable adaptability and is already working to mitigate these
problems. In the next decade, we can expect significant innovation
around the Bitcoin network. Much of that will revolve around payments,
particularly early on. The real value, though, lies beyond.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
BobbyLee brockPierce

Bobby Lee, Brock Pierce Join Bitcoin Foundation’s Board of Directors

(CoinDesk) Bobby Lee and Brock Pierce have joined the Bitcoin Foundation’s board
of directors, after coming top in a second round of votes cast by the
organisation’s industry members.
The run-off election featured three candidates, including BTC China CEO Bobby Lee, venture capitalist Brock Pierce and CEO of mobile gift card provider Gyft, Vinny Lingham.
The results were particularly close, with Lee receiving 79% approval
and Pierce scoring 65% – just 2% above Lingham, who received 63%.
With the announcement, Lee and Pierce join a board that includes executive director Jon Matonis, bitcoin chief scientist Gavin Andresen, Bitcoin Magazine’s Elizabeth Ploshay and Ribbit Capital’s Micky Malka, alongside founder and chairman Peter Vessenes.
This news follows the 1st May results of an initial round of voting, which ended with none of the original 15 candidates reaching the necessary vote threshold to win a seat.
These industry seats have been vacant since the resignation of two founding members – former BitInstant CEO Charlie Shrem and Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpeles – earlier this year.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
michael novograts 2

Investor Mike Novogratz has a very simple argument for why he’s bullish on Bitcoin

(BusinessInsider) Former Goldman Sachs partner and current Fortress Investment Group CIO
Michael Novogratz says the smartest guys in the room have all turned
their attention to Bitcoin.
In an interview Monday with Bloomberg Television’s Stephanie Ruhle at
the 2014 Sohn investing conference, Novogratz explained how Bitcoin has
grown to capture the imaginations of programmers from its libertarian
roots:

There are in best estimates somewhere
30,000 individual programmers working on Bitcoin. My college roommate
lives down in Barbados. He was the smartest guy that we went to school
with [Novogratz graduated from Princeton — ed.]. He full time works on
derivatives of Bitcoin. So there’s this open source community where
there’s huge brain power, let alone all the VC money that’s going in.
And so from Marc Andreessen and his company to Benchmark… there’s lots
of smart money going in. I’ve never seen a small project with more human
capital going into it, and so I kind of want to bet just on that
alone.”

Ruhle pressed him on whether Bitcoin could simply flame out.
Novogratz responded by saying it would lead to the “democratization of
finance.”

I think you’re going to see things like
peer-to-peer lending. The banks are – their biggest I think threat is
the same thing that’s happened in so many other industries now happening
to the finance industry, right? The Internet disintermediates large
players and I think Bitcoin is just one of the threats that the finance
industry the way we know it has coming against it.

Fortress is sitting on $13 million-worth of bitcoins. In February, the firm became the first publicly-traded company to file Bitcoin holdings (they were listed as losses).

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi