Category Archive: US

FlypMe Banner
WashingtonDC

Washington considers digital currencies are included in the definition of “money”

(BitcoinExaminer) The state of Washington, in the United States, has declared that digital currencies are included in the definition of “money”, within the state’s Uniform Money Services Act (UMSA).

The new definition can be consulted at the Department of Financial Institutions’ (DFI) website, where the state’s authority provides information to money transmitters and currency exchangers.

The virtual page reads that “virtual
currency, also known as digital currency or cryptocurrency, is a medium
of exchange not authorized or adopted by a government. There are many
different digital currencies being used over the internet, the most
commonly known being Bitcoin. In Washington, digital currency is included in the definition of ‘money’  in the Uniform Money Services Act”.

According to the legislature of
Washington state, “money means a medium of exchange that is authorized
or adopted by the United States or a foreign government or other
recognized medium of exchange. ‘Money’ includes a monetary unit of
account established by an intergovernmental organization or by agreement
between two or more governments”. Nevertheless, the state considers
that digital currencies can be part of this definition.

Washington’s recent alteration to the status of Bitcoin and other virtual coins was quite discreet, but a Redditor shared the information on the platform.

The department’s website also adds that
“companies wishing to transmit money for Washington residents in a
digital currency form can contact the DFI for a determination whether licensure under the UMSA is required. If it is, a license is required before the company can engage in the activity”.

The decision made by the Department of Financial Institutions opens a precedent that will surely affect how the financial authorities, courts and judges across the state (and maybe even out of it) look at cases that include Bitcoin or other digital currencies.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi

US senator demands regulatory clarification on digital currencies

(CoinDesk) US Senator Tom Carper yesterday called on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to clarify its position on digital currencies.
Carper is a Delaware Democrat and he currently heads up the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
It should be noted that Delaware is home to many credit card companies
in the US, thanks to business-friendly regulations that have attracted
numerous financial institutions to the state.
According to Bloomberg,
Carper’s staff are already working on a report on digital currencies,
scheduled for release sometime in the spring. Carper’s email to the CFTC
was a response to an earlier letter from former CFTC chair Gary
Gensler. He, in turn, was responding to an inquiry on digital currencies
filed by Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma.

The tone of Carper’s email is
interesting: “Given that we read about a new venture in the digital
currency space nearly every day, it is important that our government
agencies respond appropriately and in a timely manner with thoughtful
policy and oversight.”

“Those willing to take risks and play by the rules should have the opportunity to thrive without the fog of uncertainty.”

It appears that Carper isn’t looking for a clampdown on digital currencies – he merely wants to eliminate any ambiguities.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
Chris Dixon a16z site 315x472

Silicon Valley VC thinks a single bitcoin will be worth $100,000

(Wired) — Just a
year ago, a bitcoin was worth $13. And today, the same piece of digital
currency is valued at more than $800 on popular online money exchanges.
But Chris Dixon believes that’s still a serious bargain.
Dixon, a partner with the big-name
Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andressen Horowitz, is adamant that
bitcoin could become the primary means of making payments on the
internet, and if that happens, the price of a bitcoin will skyrocket. “I
think it could be easily worth $100,000,” he says.

 Venture Capitalist Believes Bitcoin Will Hit $100000

That may seem crazy, but Dixon is not
alone. Many among the bitcoin faithful believe that current bitcoin
prices are on the low side compared to what they will become. You see,
there are only a limited number of bitcoins — the worldwide software
system that drives the digital currency will stop minting money sometime
in the next century, when there are about 21 million in circulation —
and this means that a spike in popularity will likely drive a huge
increase in price.
Still not convinced? Dixon points to
what has happened with another scarce but widely used internet resource.
“Domain names are an analogy,” he says. “It would have been absurd to
say in 1993 that domain names were worth $10 million each.” But now, that’s a reality.
Sure, $10 million domains aren’t the
norm. But according to Dixon, the startups funded by Andressen-Horowitz
typically pay a “couple of hundred grand” for a domain name that
includes a no-more-than-average word. “Probably the best investment in
computer history would have been buying domain names in 1993,” he says.
“Better than Amazon. Better than Google.”

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
US Senate hearing bitcoin testimony 600x370

A deep dive into the regulatory requirements for Bitcoin companies

(OnBitcoin) Marco Santori is a senior associate at New York-based Nesenoff & Miltenberg, LLP,
and very familiar with the nuances of Bitcoin regulation. In a
presentation at the Inside Bitcoins conference in Las Vegas, Mr. Santori
provided a thorough overview of money transmission regulation on the
federal and state levels.

Money services businesses (MSBs) are regulated by FinCEN, whose goal is to prevent money laundering.

MSBs are required to register with FinCEN on a federal level. While
it’s a free, online process to register, there are an assortment of
requirements, such as:

  • Collect, verify, record report customer information
  • Check identities against watch lists (terrorists, criminal, enemies of the state)
  • Deny service for some customers
  • Sometimes secretly report transaction activitiy to fincen and continue servicing the customer
  • Undergo yearly audits

Bitcoins Political Donations

In March 2013 FinCEN published regulatory guidance surrounding
Bitcoin. While this guidance left some confused, the overall takeaway
was that Bitcoin is not inherently illegal and Bitcoin companies are
fine to operate as long as they comply with applicable laws.

Santori provided examples of businesses that would be under the veil of regulation:

  • Hosted wallets that permit exporting private keys
  • Paper wallets
  • Exchange digital currency for government currency
  • Exchange one digital currency for another
  • Mine digital currency and convert to government currency
  • Accept value from person A and give to person B
  • Accept value from person A and give to person A at another time or place

While it’s easy to register on the federal level, it’s another story
on the state level. There are 48 states that provide licenses for money
transmission. The states regulate money transmitters separately from the
federal government. So, for a company to operate in the United States,
they need to separately attain 48 licenses, which is a timely and costly
endeavor.

While it’s more complex to apply for licenses in 48 states, the scope
of regulation appears to be slightly less cumbersome. The states have
not adopted all of FinCEN’s categories of money transmitter.
Specifically, only these two categories are relevant:

  • Accept value from person A and give to person B
  • Accept value from person A and give to person A at another time or place

Given the ambiguity and cost of regulation, what should a startup do?

Circle Internet Financial, a company formed by serial entrepreneur
Jeremy Allaire, publicly stated that they will be seeking licenses in
all states and raised $9 million in venture capital to fund that
initiative.

However, there are a plethora of startups that don’t have the funds
or capabilities to attain licenses. Here are some other options.

First, a company could send a “no action” or “request for ruling”
letter, which explains the nature of the business and why it should not
require a license. Drafting this letter can be costly due to legal fees
but can also result in certainty if authorities respond.

There are also avoidance strategies. You can incorporate overseas and
geofilter IP addresses to block US customers. By documenting this
process and having appropriate policies in place, a company can protect
themselves from regulatory backlash if some US customers get through.
For example, a company should check if the customer registers a US bank
account, makes transfers to US accounts or subsequently accesses the
company’s service from US IP addresses.

Santori said that most companies restructure their companies to
either fit into an exception in the regulation. Exceptions include:

  • Providing network services to a money transmitter
  • White label exchange
  • Physically transporting value that substitutes for currency
  • Operating a settlement business between MSBs
  • Performing payment processing services

If a company wants to get a state license, how long does it take to
get approved? For a regular business, just a few weeks. But for a
Bitcoin business, it’s not clear.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
fincen1

This Senate hearing is a Bitcoin lovefest

(WashingtonPost) The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs,
chaired by Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), is holding the first congressional
hearing on the future of Bitcoin. The first panel features senior
figures from the Obama administration. And their comments about Bitcoin
have been remarkably positive.

After the officials gave their opening statements, Carper’s first
question drew a parallel to the Internet. He pointed out that in the
early days of the Internet revolution, many people raised concerns about
illicit use of Internet technologies. Yet in the long run, he argued,
the Internet has had a hugely beneficial effect on peoples lives, making
possible previously unimagined services like Facebook and YouTube.
Carper wanted to know if the witnesses saw Bitcoin in the same light.

Jennifer Calvery, director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network, agreed with Carper. “Innovation is a very important part of our
economy. It’s something for us to be proud of,” she said.

“We are attuned to the criminal use,” added Mythili Raman of the
Justice Department. But “there are many legitimate uses. These virtual
currencies are not in and of themselves illegal.”

“There is good reason for us to remain watchful” about Bitcoin being
used for illicit purposes, Raman added. “But we also intend to balance
that against the need for legitimate users” to use the technology.

Later in the same panel, Edward Lowery of the Secret Service
testified that cyber criminals “have not by and large gravitated toward
peer-to-peer cryptocurrencies.” Rather, they “have by and large
gravitated toward centralized digital currencies that are based in a
locale that may have less regulatory guidelines and less aggressive law
enforcement.”

That’s been the tenor of the entire hearing so far. All three Obama
administration officials expressed concern about Bitcoin being used for
illicit uses. But they also stressed that Bitcoin has important
legitimate uses and that regulators need to be careful not to stifle
innovation in virtual currencies. And they seemed to believe that the
situation was under control, and none asked for new regulatory powers to
crack down on illicit uses of the currency.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
volume transactions

Bitcoin price skyrockets as Senate hearing concludes

(CoinDesk) The price of bitcoin spiked dramatically last night and the
transaction volume on the Bitcoin protocol (in USD) eclipsed that of
Western Union.
The spike took place after Jerry Brito, Patrick
Murck and Jeremy Allaire presented their testimonies on bitcoin and the
future of virtual currencies to the Homeland Security and Governmental
affairs committee in the US senate at the Senate hearing titled Beyond Silk Road: Potential Risks, Threats and Promises of Virtual Currencies.
The CoinDesk BPI read $650 on conclusion of the hearings, with Mt. Gox reporting a jump to $750 and, later, BTC China reaching a record high of 6,989 CNY (approximately $1,147) before crashing to almost 60% of this value in seconds, and then recovering to about $850. At the time of writing, the CoinDesk BPI puts the price at $602.
The
senate hearing is being hailed as an historic moment for bitcoin, with
even Ben Bernanke, current chairman of the Federal Reserve remarking
that virtual currencies “may hold long term promise” in an open letter
to Senator Thomas Carper (D) published 12th November.
At the
hearing, Senator Carper listened to commentary, criticism and praise of
bitcoin with a temperament that left many in the bitcoin community
impressed and even delighted, whilst Jennifer Shaskey Calvery from
FinCEN was measured in her analysis and assessment of the promises and
threats that virtual currencies present.
This morning, data analysis website Coinometrics reported
that bitcoin passed Western Union in daily transaction volume,
transacting an average of $245m compared with Western Union’s estimated
$216m but is still behind on the average number of daily transactions at
approximately 62,000, with Western Union clocking up approximately
633,000 transactions per day by comparison.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi
btc

Bitcoin skyrockets to $600 after U.S. agencies label it legitimate

(DailyDot) The Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission told senators that bitcoins are “legitimate financial instruments,” Bloomberg reports. The news comes just three days ahead of a U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on Bitcoins,

Almost immediately following the article publication at 12:01am ET, the
average price of Bitcoins jumped over $50, from $495 to $554, sprinting
past the $500 milestone. It has continued to climb to a $583 average in the hours since. At Mt. Gox, the largest Bitcoin exchange, the currency is already selling for $630.

The Senate committee, which was scheduled immediately following the fall of the Deep Web black market Silk Road, aims “to explore potential promises and risks related to virtual currency for the federal government and society at large.”

The FBI’s approach to virtual currencies is guided by a recognition
that online payment systems, both centralized and decentralized, offer
legitimate financial services,” Peter Kadzik, principal deputy assistant
attorney general, wrote according to Bloomberg.

Like any financial service, virtual currency systems of either type
can be exploited by malicious actors, but centralized and decentralized
online payment systems can vary significantly in the types and degrees
of illicit financial risk they pose.

Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, said he had no plans
to regulate the currency. In fact, Bernanke isn’t sure if the Fed even
has the authority to do so.

In an article on Sunday, Time reported that the Senate hearings were “just the beginning.”

Honestly, the environment seems to be a game of hot potato where no
politician wants to be caught being pro or anti bitcoin,” Charles
Hoskinson, director of the Bitcoin Education Project, told the magazine.
“Once the market cap gets to around $10 billion or so, then expect real
hearings and a lot of lobbying.”

At nearly $7 billion and triple what it was just two weeks ago, the cap is closing in fast on Hoskinson’s milestone.

The reaction in the Bitcoin world has been ecstatic. After similar reports of Chinese authorities saying the government has no plans to
regulate the digital currency, news that the U.S. is following suit is
exactly what Bitcoin-backers had hoped for. Around the Internet, bitcoin
enthusiasts talked about the adrenaline they felt watching the price
surge this morning.

There is already widespread speculation in the community that the currency will soon enough reach $1,000—and beyond.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi

Bitcoin couple travels the world using virtual cash

“In bitcoin,” Austin Craig repeated to the young woman behind the
counter at the Lean Crust Pizza parlor in the Fort Greene neighborhood
of Brooklyn, N.Y. “Can we pay in bitcoin?”

“In what?” came the reply.

Mr. Craig, 30
years old, was struggling to convince Nadia Alamgir of the existence of
the virtual currency that has gained traction across the world, and
whose value—after months of wild swings—on Wednesday reached records
around $400 per bitcoin.

It was midway through a tricontinental
odyssey taken with his wife, Beccy Bingham-Craig, 29, and a film crew
documenting their travails, which started in Provo, Utah. Their mission:
to live on bitcoin alone.

“It’s been consistently inconvenient
and occasionally frustrating,” Mr. Craig said outside Lean Crust, “but
never impossible.” Lean Crust advertised itself as bitcoin-friendly but
hadn’t seen much virtual foot traffic. Ms. Alamgir eventually contacted
the store’s owner, who arrived and processed the transaction, allowing
Mr. Craig to munch on several slices.

Lean Crust, though, is one
of a tiny but growing number of stores, travel agents and online
merchants starting to accept the once-obscure digital currency as a
means of payment. Bitcoin doesn’t exist, except in the virtual world,
and can only be passed from one person to another electronically. Its
origins are murky: Conventional wisdom says a man or group of people
going by the name Satoshi Nakamoto created bitcoin in 2009, stoking
demand by making it obtainable only through complicated algorithmic
searches by powerful computers.

But in the past 12 months, the
bitcoin zeitgeist has taken on a life of its own. The currency is
discussed at investing conferences now. The Winklevoss twins, known for
their fight with Facebook Inc. founder Mark Zuckerberg, have started a
bitcoin fund. It also has gained the attention of regulators who worry
it can be used to launder money.

For the Craigs, bitcoin represented a chance at adventure—and an underground movie career.

They
began their trek in October by driving east from Provo in Ms.
Bingham-Craig’s 2004 Volkswagen Jetta. After arriving in New York on
Oct 17, they flew to Stockholm, Berlin and Singapore before eventually
returning to Provo. In the end, they lasted 101 days, from July 23 to
Nov 1.

The Craigs weren’t part of the bitcoin underground when
they began the project. Mr. Craig said he first heard of the currency in
2011 and then came up with the plan to live and travel solely on
bitcoin.
“I’m really excited about bitcoin and its future,” Mr. Craig said. “It’s a reimagining of money.”

Starting
July 23, the day they returned from their honeymoon, the Craigs paid
for everything with bitcoin, from rent to food to gas. At that time, one
bitcoin was worth about $98, based on trading at the Tokyo-based Mt.
Gox exchange, a primary exchange bitcoin enthusiasts have tracked.

During
the trip, they had to not only introduce a number of people to the
fledging currency but to persuade them to use it. After a few weeks of
prodding, their landlord, Justin James, agreed to the plan—with the
sweetener of a small premium over the rent—and set up his own bitcoin
account.

“In the end,” Mr. James said, “it hasn’t been as much of
an inconvenience as I thought it would be.” While he hasn’t become a
convert, he did say he thought the experiment sounded like fun and was
“happy to be a part of it.”

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi

What exactly does the US government really think of Bitcoin?


(CoinDesk) With the US Senate setting 18th November as the start date for its committee hearings into bitcoin, it’s time to
take a look at some of the more significant events in bitcoin’s short but colorful legal history.
The early Bitcoin timeline featured hacks, heists, drugs, demands for refunds and the first appeals to law enforcement, but 2013 saw official scrutiny rise almost as quickly as bitcoin’s value.

Whether or not bitcoin requires, or should seek, regulatory approval is a major source of heated debate on bitcoin discussion forums, but the regulation issue will remain prominent as long as significant amounts of wealth are at stake.

FinCEN issued guidelines that bitcoin-related businesses counted as “Money Service Businesses” (MSBs) under US law.
This meant bitcoin businesses were now officially required to provide authorities with information about potentially suspicious transactions and introduce policies to prevent money laundering. These regulations also affect the more centralized virtual currencies and point systems used in social networks and online games, including Facebook and Second Life. Lack of a centralized authority meant bitcoin itself could not comply, but any business associated with its use would need to — including individual miners, if they converted their bitcoin to fiat currency.

In something of a rare public compliment for bitcoin from the world of traditional finance, François R. Velde, senior economist of the Federal Reserve in Chicago wrote a glowing paper titled “Bitcoin: A Primer” in which he wrote bitcoin was a “remarkable conceptual and technical achievement, which may well be used by existing financial institutions.” He further described bitcoin as an “elegant solution” to the digital currency problem and claimed its value derived from certain beliefs about the nature and function of money, and the amounts of fiat currencies traded for it.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi

US Homeland Security committee to explore bitcoin’s potential in 18th Nov hearing

(CoinDesk – @Southopia) The US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs has set 18th November as the date for its hearing into bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
US Senator Tom Carper, chairman of the committee, said last week that the aim of the hearing, titled ‘Beyond Silk Road: potential risks, threats, and promises of virtual currencies’, is to “dig into what a whole-government approach to this new and unique technology may look like”.
According to a post on the Bitcoin Talk forum, several people representing bitcoin interests have been invited to testify, including members of the Bitcoin Foundation.
The hearing will feature two separate panels, one representing US law enforcement agencies and another representing bitcoin, extolling the virtues of digital currencies.
The US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs is also soon to hold a hearing about bitcoin, although the exact date of this is yet to be made public.

Open your free digital wallet here to store your cryptocurrencies in a safe place.

Satoshi